LEGGINGS ARE NOT PANTS.
Seriously, if you are reading that and saying, "well, actually ..." or "but ..." you are definitely WRONG. Leggings are NOT pants. Yes, it's super comfy to wear them around the apartment with whatever else you like, but whenever even your toe is stepping out in public, you need to get this under control. If you are going out in leggings - and by leggings, I generally mean anything that hugs your booty so tight that nothing is left to the imagination AND has no pockets or zipper - you should adhere to the following rule: wear a tunic-length top with them. There are absolutely no exceptions to this rule. Not even based on the weight, size or height of the offender. If they show every outline of your lower body anatomy, it needs to be covered up. It's not flattering. On ANYONE.
Personally, I think this rule also applies to gym wear. If you are wearing true leggings - meaning, they are tight all the way to your ankle - you should wear a shirt that hits at least mid-hip, even when at the gym. Even with running TIGHTS. Even if it's a slim fitting fleece pullover, it should hit at least below your waist if you're planning to venture out to bounce up and down in those things. (Yoga PANTS, with a flared lower leg and ankle, are acceptable with other tops.) (Are we all noticing this handy little trend, with the name of these items? Okeydokey then.)
Furthermore, leggings are of a certain material that distinguishes them from other types of hosiery. (Really, the fact that leggings are sold in the hosiery department should be a big enough clue as to how they should be worn, but whatever.) They are not opaque. Heavy but opaque hosiery = tights. Lightweight hosiery = pantyhose. Recently, a friend of mine reported that she saw a girl in Forever 21 wearing tights as pants. Yes, they had a "control top" area (for all you non-Spanx wearing ladies, that's the upper-thigh-and-above area, which is a darker, less opaque material), and yes, this area was completely visible. She was wearing a short top. I'm not really sure how I would have reacted, had I seen this myself. I'm fairly certain an audible "gasp" would have been involved. My friend was too shocked and appalled to do much else, herself.
If this is all still a little confusing (in which case, you shouldn't be allowed to even shop in stores with these "expert level" fashion choices, but I'll keep trying anyway), I direct you to Kat Storm's handy little rule:
PANTY HOSE are not TIGHTS. TIGHTS are not LEGGINGS. LEGGINGS are not PANTS, and as much as you might like to be, YOU ARE NOT LADY GAGA.
For serious.
Finally, that brings me to jeggings. This is a confusing area. They look like skinny jeans, because they have pockets and zippers. But they fit almost like leggings. The difference here are the back pockets. They help disguise and flatter any unneccesary oversharing that goes on back there with leggings. But I think it's worth mentioning - with jeggings, like skinny jeans, discretion is the way to go. If you sincerely look in the mirror and say, "oh hells yeah, my butt is rockin' these!" and then get a similar compliment when you head out in them, you're good to go. If you think the former, but don't receive the latter? Rethink the former. And if you look in the mirror and say, "well, it's trendy, so I guess this is how it should look"? Take them off and put on some proper bloody pants.
Please spread the word. Unlike the coat tack issue, it's really inappropriate for me to start handing out cards to the offenders ("Excuse me, I can see too much of your ass. Please remedy accordingly.")


